Smith v. Converse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. Converse

78 N.Y.S. 1137

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 78 N.Y.S. 1137 (Smith v. Converse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Converse, 78 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

No opinion.

PER CURIAM.

This order should be reversed, on the ground that the affidavit read in opposition to the motion is not sufficient, under the settled rules of practice relating to this class of motions, to show that the opposing party really has a larger number of material and necessary witnesses in Kings county. The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, changing the place of trial, with costs to the defendant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No opinion.

PER CURIAM.

This order should be reversed, on the ground that the affidavit read in opposition to the motion is not sufficient, under the settled rules of practice relating to this class of motions, to show that the opposing party really has a larger number of material and necessary witnesses in Kings county. The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, changing the place of trial, with costs to the defendant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-converse-nyappdiv-1902.