Smith v. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE

Michigan Supreme Court

Smith v. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE

688 N.W.2d 90, 471 Mich. 894

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 25, 2004

Docket123883

StatusPublished

This text of 688 N.W.2d 90 (Smith v. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE, 688 N.W.2d 90, 471 Mich. 894 (Mich. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

688 N.W.2d 90 (2004)

SMITH
v.
COMMUNITY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE.

123883.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 25, 2004.

SC: 123883. COA: 247770.

By order of July 10, 2003, the application for leave to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decisions in Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, Inc. (Docket Nos. 121723-24) and Lawrence v. Battle Creek Health Systems (Docket No. 122215). On order of the Court, the opinion in Bryant having been issued on July 30, 2004, 471 Mich. 411, 684 N.W.2d 864 (2004), and leave to appeal having been denied in Lawrence, 469 Mich. 1043, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2004), the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

688 N.W.2d 90 (2004)

SMITH
v.
COMMUNITY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE.

123883.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 25, 2004.

SC: 123883. COA: 247770.

By order of July 10, 2003, the application for leave to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decisions in Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, Inc. (Docket Nos. 121723-24) and Lawrence v. Battle Creek Health Systems (Docket No. 122215). On order of the Court, the opinion in Bryant having been issued on July 30, 2004, 471 Mich. 411, 684 N.W.2d 864 (2004), and leave to appeal having been denied in Lawrence, 469 Mich. 1043, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2004), the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

688 N.W.2d 90, 471 Mich. 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-community-emergency-medical-service-mich-2004.

Opinion

SMITH v. COMMUNITY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

SMITH
v.
COMMUNITY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE.