Smith v. Commissioner

1985 T.C. Memo. 167, 49 T.C.M. 1144, 1985 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 465
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Commissioner. Read the opinion of the Court — 80 T.C. 1165
United States Tax Court·Decided April 3, 1985·No. Docket No. 3952-78.·Unpublished

Opinion

JAMES B. SMITH and JEAN T. SMITH, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Smith v. Commissioner
Docket No. 3952-78.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1985-167; 1985 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 465; 49 T.C.M. (CCH) 1144; T.C.M. (RIA) 85167;
April 3, 1985.
James B. Smith, pro se.
Ronald J. Gardner, for the respondent.

GOFFE

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

GOFFE, Judge: The commissioner determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income tax for the taxable years and*466 additions to tax under section 6653(b) 1 in separate statutory notices of deficiencies, as follows:

James B. Smith
Taxable YearDeficiencySec. 6653(b)
1971$621.81$466.00
19721,151.64630.50
19731,335.08774.50
Jean T. Smith
Taxable YearDeficiencySec. 6653(b)
1971$110.00$99.50
1972231.00115.50
1973120.0060.00

The issues for decision are: (1) whether petitioners earned income during the taxable years 1971, 1972, and 1973 in the amounts set forth in their separate notices of deficiency; (2) whether petitioners are liable for the additions to tax under section 6653(b) for fraud; and (3) whether petitioners are liable for damages under section 6673.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Some of the facts have been stipulated. The stipulation of facts and accompanying exhibits are so found and incorporated herein by reference.

James B. Smith and Jean T. Smith (Mr. Smith or Mrs. Smith or, collectively, petitioners) were*467 residents of the State of Idaho at the time the petition in this case was filed. Petitioners filed Federal income tax returns for the taxable years 1969 and 1970. Petitioners did not file Federal income tax returns for the taxable years at issue: 1971, 1972, and 1973. Mr. and Mrs. Smith each filed a Form W-4, Employee's Withholding Exemption Certificate, dated May 26, 1971, claiming 10 exemptions for dependents. Petitioners were entitled to claim no more than two exemptions during the taxable years at issue.

Mr. Smith was convicted on August 31, 1972, of filing a false Form W-4, Employee's Withholding Exemption Certificate, in violation of section 7205.

Mrs. Smith was convicted on June 18, 1974, of filing a false Form W-4, Employee's Withholding Exemption Certificate, in violation of section 7205.

Petitioners were both convicted on June 8, 1976, of willfully failing to file income tax returns for the taxable years 1971, 1972, and 1973 (the taxable years at issue in this case), a violation of section 7203.

Mr. Smith was employed by Carpenter Paper Co. during the taxable years at issue, and received compensation in the amounts of $6,502.08, $8,265.14, and $9,411.92 for the*468 taxable years 1971, 1972, and 1973, respectively.

Mrs. Smith was employed by Swiss Boy during the taxable years at issue, and received compensation in the amounts of $2,316.05, $2,688.45, and $1,872.19 for the taxable years 1971, 1972, and 1973, respectively.

On January 30, 1978, petitioners each received a statutory notice of deficiency for the taxable years 1971, 1972, and 1973. The Commissioner determined that each of the petitioners failed to report the income received for each of the three taxable years, that each petitioner underpaid their Federal income tax, and that the underpayments were due to fraud.

OPINION

The Commissioner's determination in his statutory notice of deficiency is presumptively correct, and petitioners have the burden of disproving each individual adjustment. Welch v. Helvering,290 U.S. 111 (1933); Rule 142(a). Petitioners earned income during each of the taxable years at issue, and presented no evidence in support of any deductions or credits against that income. The Commissioner's determination of deficiencies is sustained. Rule 142(a).

The next issue for decision is whether petitioners are liable for the additions to tax*469 under section 6653(b) for fraud. The burden of proving fraud is on respondent, and he must do so by clear and convincing evidence. Sec. 7454(a); Rule 142(b); Stone v. Commissioner,56 T.C. 213, 220 (1971). This burden is met if it is shown that the taxpayer intended to evade taxes known to be owing by conduct intended to conceal, mislead, or otherwise prevent the collection of taxes, and that there is an underpayment of tax.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Commissioner, 1985 T.C. Memo. 167, 49 T.C.M. 1144, 1985 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 465 (tax 1985).

1985 T.C. Memo. 167 (Smith v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Welch v. Helvering
290 U.S. 111 (Supreme Court, 1933)
Spies v. United States
317 U.S. 492 (Supreme Court, 1943)
John W. Amos v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
360 F.2d 358 (Fourth Circuit, 1965)
Acker v. Commissioner
26 T.C. 107 (U.S. Tax Court, 1956)
Amos v. Commissioner
43 T.C. 50 (U.S. Tax Court, 1964)
Strachan v. Commissioner
48 T.C. 335 (U.S. Tax Court, 1967)
Otsuki v. Commissioner
53 T.C. 96 (U.S. Tax Court, 1969)
Beaver v. Commissioner
55 T.C. 85 (U.S. Tax Court, 1970)
Stone v. Commissioner
56 T.C. 213 (U.S. Tax Court, 1971)
Swanson v. Commissioner
65 T.C. 1180 (U.S. Tax Court, 1976)
Gajewski v. Commissioner
67 T.C. 181 (U.S. Tax Court, 1976)
Nicholas v. Commissioner
70 T.C. 1057 (U.S. Tax Court, 1978)
Grosshandler v. Commissioner
75 T.C. 1 (U.S. Tax Court, 1980)
McCoy v. Commissioner
76 T.C. 1027 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)
Habersham-Bey v. Commissioner
78 T.C. No. 22 (U.S. Tax Court, 1982)