Smith v. Commissioner
Opinion
WILES,
| Addition to Tax | ||
| Year | Deficiency | 1 Sec. 6653(a) |
| 1978 | $466.08 | $23.30 |
| 1979 | 446.08 | 22.30 |
After concessions by the parties, the sole issue remaining for decision is whether petitioners are entitled to a foreign tax credit under section 901 for the taxable years in issue.
Some of the facts have been stipulated and are found accordingly.
Petitioners Melvin B. Smith and Velda A. Smith (hereinafter petitioners) resided in Wichita, Kansas, when they filed their petition in this case. Petitioners timely filed their joint income tax returns for the taxable years 1978 and 1979 with the Internal Revenue Service Center in Austin, Texas. They computed their taxable income on a calendar basis and reported their income and deductions in accordance with the cash method of accounting.
During the*168 taxable years 1978 and 1979 petitioners had no foreign source income. They claimed foreign tax credits of $401.08 and $40.56 on their 1978 and 1979 returns, respectively, based upon a carryover of foreign taxes from the taxable year 1976. Respondent determined that petitioners were not entitled
In general, subject to the limitation of section 904, section 901(a) and (b) 2 allows a foreign tax credit for the amount of any creditable taxes paid or accrued during the taxable year to a foreign country or United States possession.
*169 The section 904 limitation on which we focus in this case is the following:
SEC. 904. LIMITATION ON CREDIT.
(a) Limitation.--The total amount of the credit taken under section 901(a)
In the present case, petitioners had no income from sources without the United States during 1978 and 1979 and, hence, no taxable income from such sources in those years. See sec. 862(b). Pursuant to section 904(a), therefore, the maximum allowable foreign tax credit for petitioners' 1978 and*170 1979 taxable years is zero. Under the express language of sections 901(a) and (b) and 904(a), the limitation of section 904(a) applies regardless of whether the foreign taxes that give rise to a credit are those that are actually paid or accrued during the taxable year in issue or those that the deemed paid or accrued
*171 It is true, as petitioners note, that the underlying purpose of the foreign tax credit provisions is to eliminate double taxation. See ; .Contrary to petitioners' contention, however, Congress did not intend that a taxpayer be allowed a credit against United States tax for
[i]t is
Petitioners here are requesting that the foreign taxes they paid be used to offset United States tax on United States source income. This is not the purpose of the credit and is specifically prohibited by section 904(a). *172 We hold for respondent on this issue.
Due to the parties' concessions,
Footnotes
1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1984 T.C. Memo. 509 (Smith v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.