Smith v. Commerce Club, Inc.
This text of 22 F. App'x 925 (Smith v. Commerce Club, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[926]*926MEMORANDUM
Tommy Smith appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint alleging that the defendant discriminated against him based on his race. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U .S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
We review de novo a district court’s dismissal based on res judicata. W. Radio Servs. Co. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189, 1192 (9th Cir.1997).
The district court correctly concluded that Smith’s federal claims against Commerce Club are precluded based on the doctrine of res judicata. See Mir v. Little Co. of Mary Hosp., 844 F.2d 646, 651 (9th Cir.1988); San Francisco Lathing, Inc. v. Superior Court, 271 Cal.App.2d 78, 76 Cal. Rptr. 304, 307 (Cal.Ct.App.1969) (holding that a dismissal for lack of prosecution is a final judgment).
Smith’s remaining contentions lack merit.
Smith’s request for judicial notice is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F. App'x 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-commerce-club-inc-ca9-2002.