Smith v. Cohen

55 A.D.3d 841, 865 N.Y.S.2d 588
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Cohen. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 A.D.3d 183

Opinion

pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondent, Jeffrey Cohen, a Justice of the County Court, Westchester County, from proceeding with the trial in an action entitled People v Smith, pending in that court under indictment No. 08-00084.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d [842]*842564, 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Spolzino, J.E, Ritter, Santucci and Garni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Cohen, 55 A.D.3d 841, 865 N.Y.S.2d 588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

55 A.D.3d 841 (Smith v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rush v. Mordue
502 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Holtzman v. Goldman
523 N.E.2d 297 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)