Smith v. Cobb

1 Stew. 62
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1827
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Stew. 62 (Smith v. Cobb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Cobb, 1 Stew. 62 (Ala. 1827).

Opinion

JUDGE SAFFOLD

delivered the opinion of the majority of the Court.

The maker and endorser cannot be joined in the same action at law. Smith and Fortner vere compelled to submit to the illegal judgement of the justice, or remove the case to an appellate Court. The appellate tribunal is directed by statute to try an appeal from the judgement oí a justice of the peace, according to the justice and equity of the case, without regarding any defect in the warrant, capias, or summons, or other proceedings of the justice. 1 conceive that the intention of ..his statute was to cure such defects, or irregularities in the proceedings of justices, as do not affect the essential rights of the parties; not to sanction a misjoinder of parties. It is true, the misjoinder here was corrected in the County Court, but it was at an expense to one of the defendants, perhaps equal to the amount in controversy. It is the opinion of the majority of the Court, that the judgement must be reversed.

The Chief Justioe not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crawford v. Mills
79 So. 456 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)
Frierson v. Blakesley
3 Stew. 267 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1830)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Stew. 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-cobb-ala-1827.