Smith v. Clarendon

3 Silv. Sup. 140, 25 N.Y. St. Rep. 221
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 9, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Silv. Sup. 140 (Smith v. Clarendon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Clarendon, 3 Silv. Sup. 140, 25 N.Y. St. Rep. 221 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the case of The Campbell Printing Press Co. v. Damon (48 Hun, 509; 16 N. Y. State Rep. 133), Van Brunt, P. J., said, “It has been the settled law of this state, since the decision of the case of Thompson v. Van Vechten (27 N. Y. 568), that' a mortgage not filed of a chattle not delivered is void as to a creditor at large whose claim accrues while the default in filing continues, though such creditor is not in a position to raise the question until he has obtained judgment against the property.” This proposition disposes of all the points presented for our consideration in behalf of the appellants in the case at bar, and requires an affirmance of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. . Van Vechten
27 N.Y. 568 (New York Court of Appeals, 1863)
Campbell Printing-Press & Manufacturing Co. v. Damon
1 N.Y.S. 185 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Silv. Sup. 140, 25 N.Y. St. Rep. 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-clarendon-nysupct-1889.