Smith v. City of Troy
429 N.E.2d 425, 54 N.Y.2d 890, 444 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3093
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We cannot say as a matter of law that the Appellate Division abused its discretion.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. City of Troy, 429 N.E.2d 425, 54 N.Y.2d 890, 444 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3093 (N.Y. 1981).
429 N.E.2d 425 (Smith v. City of Troy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brent v. TVR Group Inc
2025 NY Slip Op 50245(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2025)
Athanasiou v. Esposito
212 A.D.2d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Lyons v. Butler
134 A.D.2d 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Balancio v. American Optical Corp.
488 N.E.2d 106 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Rumrill v. Epting
88 A.D.2d 1047 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)