Smith v. City of Hemet
371 F.3d 1045, 2004 WL 1305748
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 9, 2004·No. No. 02-56445·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[1046]*1046ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. City of Hemet, 371 F.3d 1045, 2004 WL 1305748 (9th Cir. 2004).
371 F.3d 1045 (Smith v. City of Hemet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. City of Hemet
371 F.3d 1045 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)