Smith v. City of Asheville

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. City of Asheville

600 F. App'x 120

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 20, 2015·No. No. 14-2297·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Lawrence Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. City of Asheville, No. 1:14-cv-00295-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Nov. [121]*12114, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Lawrence Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. City of Asheville, No. 1:14-cv-00295-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Nov. [121]*12114, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Smith v. City of Asheville, 600 F. App'x 120 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

600 F. App'x 120 (Smith v. City of Asheville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related