Smith v. City of Asheville
This text of 600 F. App'x 120 (Smith v. City of Asheville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
James Lawrence Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. City of Asheville, No. 1:14-cv-00295-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Nov. [121]*12114, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
600 F. App'x 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-city-of-asheville-ca4-2015.