Smith v. Chiles

1 White & W. 49
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 29, 1881
DocketNo. 1172, Op. Book No. 3, p. 473
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 49 (Smith v. Chiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Chiles, 1 White & W. 49 (Tex. Ct. App. 1881).

Opinion

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 124. Handwriting; proof of, hy comparison. Handwriting may be proved by comparison, that is, by comparing the handwriting of a signature or document admitted to be genuine, and already in the case, with the signature or document in dispute. Thus, the disputed signature of the alleged maker of a note sued upon may be proved by comparing it with the admitted signature of the maker to a deposition in evidence in the case. [1 Greenl. Ev. § 578.] See, also, a full discussion of proof of handwriting by comparison in Phillips v. The State, 6 Ct. App. 364; Hatch v. State, id. 384; Heard v. State, 9 Ct. App. 1.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-chiles-texapp-1881.