Smith v. Chilcote
This text of 580 F. App'x 214 (Smith v. Chilcote) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Brandon Jerod Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Chilcote, No. 1:13-cv-01173-CMH-TRJ, 2014 WL 585857 (E.D.Va. Feb. 12, 2014). We deny Smith’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
580 F. App'x 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-chilcote-ca4-2014.