Smith v. Chetta
202 A.D.2d 677, 612 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2906
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 28, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent Justice of the Supreme Court to enlarge the terms of a previously-granted certificate of relief from disabilities to include eligibility to apply for a pistol permit.
[678]*678Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
Mandamus does not lie to compel a discretionary act (see, Matter of Molea v Marasco, 64 NY2d 718). Lawrence, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Chetta, 202 A.D.2d 677, 612 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).
202 A.D.2d 677 (Smith v. Chetta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Gaul v. Sober
2020 NY Slip Op 05013 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)