Smith v. Chetta
This text of 202 A.D.2d 677 (Smith v. Chetta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent Justice of the Supreme Court to enlarge the terms of a previously-granted certificate of relief from disabilities to include eligibility to apply for a pistol permit.
[678]*678Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
Mandamus does not lie to compel a discretionary act (see, Matter of Molea v Marasco, 64 NY2d 718). Lawrence, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 A.D.2d 677, 612 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-chetta-nyappdiv-1994.