Smith v. Chestnut
133 So. 723, 222 Ala. 556, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 320
Opinion
The decree in this case is corrected so as to dismiss the bill without prejudice, and, as corrected, will be affirmed. Builders’ Supply Co. v. Harry Smith et al., ante, p. 554, 133 So. 721. It is so ordered by the court.
Corrected and affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Chestnut, 133 So. 723, 222 Ala. 556, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 320 (Ala. 1931).
133 So. 723 (Smith v. Chestnut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Builders' Supply Co. v. Smith
133 So. 721 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)