Smith v. . Chatham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Smith v. . Chatham

135 S.E. 927, 192 N.C. 831, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 444

DecidedDecember 15, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 927 (Smith v. . Chatham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. . Chatham, 135 S.E. 927, 192 N.C. 831, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 444 (N.C. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

*832 Pee CuRiAM.

The controversy on trial narrowed itself principally to issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the ease has been tried substantially in accord with the principles of law applicable.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*832 Pee CuRiAM.

The controversy on trial narrowed itself principally to issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the ease has been tried substantially in accord with the principles of law applicable.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 S.E. 927, 192 N.C. 831, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-chatham-nc-1926.