Smith v. . Chatham
135 S.E. 927, 192 N.C. 831, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 444
Opinion
The controversy on trial narrowed itself principally to issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. All matters in dispute have been settled by the verdict, and no action or ruling on the part of the trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the ease has been tried substantially in accord with the principles of law applicable.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. . Chatham, 135 S.E. 927, 192 N.C. 831, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 444 (N.C. 1926).
135 S.E. 927 (Smith v. . Chatham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.