Smith v. Central Power Co.

103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 681
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 6, 1921
DocketNos. 16764 to 16767
StatusPublished

This text of 103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 681 (Smith v. Central Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Central Power Co., 103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 681 (Ohio 1921).

Opinions

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Four members of this court concur in this judgment, but all members concurring have not agreed upon the reasons therefor. It is therefore proper for such individual judges as concur in said judgment. to file separate opinions setting forth their ■reasons for their action.

Judgments affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Hough, Robinson and Jones, JJ., concur. Johnson, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brandt v. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad
138 P. 871 (Washington Supreme Court, 1914)
Cheney v. Barker
84 N.E. 492 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)
Magee v. Overshiner
40 L.R.A. 370 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1898)
People v. Eaton
24 L.R.A. 721 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1894)
Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.
28 L.R.A. 310 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1895)
Julia Building Ass'n v. Bell Telephone Co.
88 Mo. 258 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-central-power-co-ohio-1921.