Smith v. Cavanaugh

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Cavanaugh

59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23473, 1995 WL 370443

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 22, 1995

Docket956129

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 167 (Smith v. Cavanaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Cavanaugh, 59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23473, 1995 WL 370443 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Alton B. SMITH, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Michael J. CAVANAUGH, Director, South Carolina Department of
Probation, Pardon, and Parole Services; Parker
Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina
Department of Corrections,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 956129.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 22, 1995.

Alton B. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Carl Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICES, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Cavanaugh, No. CA-94-1218-3-19AK (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Alton B. SMITH, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Michael J. CAVANAUGH, Director, South Carolina Department of
Probation, Pardon, and Parole Services; Parker
Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina
Department of Corrections,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 956129.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 22, 1995.

Alton B. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Carl Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICES, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Cavanaugh, No. CA-94-1218-3-19AK (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23473, 1995 WL 370443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-cavanaugh-ca4-1995.