Smith v. Cates

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Smith v. Cates

146 S.E.2d 823, 266 N.C. 673, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1419

DecidedMarch 9, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 146 S.E.2d 823 (Smith v. Cates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Cates, 146 S.E.2d 823, 266 N.C. 673, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1419 (N.C. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The jury, under application of settled principles of law, found as its verdict that plaintiff was not injured by the [674]*674negligence of defendant as alleged in the complaint. A careful examination of plaintiff’s assignments of error discloses no new question or matter requiring extended discussion. Neither reversible nor prejudicial error has been made to appear. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Moobe, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The jury, under application of settled principles of law, found as its verdict that plaintiff was not injured by the [674]*674negligence of defendant as alleged in the complaint. A careful examination of plaintiff’s assignments of error discloses no new question or matter requiring extended discussion. Neither reversible nor prejudicial error has been made to appear. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Moobe, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 S.E.2d 823, 266 N.C. 673, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-cates-nc-1966.