Smith v. Carolin
1 D.C. 99
This text of 1 D.C. 99 (Smith v. Carolin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Carolin, 1 D.C. 99 (D.D.C. 1802).
Opinion
refused to admit the testimony, on the general ground that the non-production of the subscribing witness induces a suspicion that if produced, he would testify something to the defendant’s advantage. Peake, L. E. 7, 64, 65, 66.
The plaintiff became nonsuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 D.C. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-carolin-dcd-1802.