Smith v. Carolin

22 F. Cas. 478, 1 Cranch 99

This text of 22 F. Cas. 478 (Smith v. Carolin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Carolin, 22 F. Cas. 478, 1 Cranch 99 (circtddc 1802).

Opinion

THE COURT

refused to admit the testimony, on the general ground that the non-production of the subscribing witness induces a suspicion that if produced, he would testify something to the defendant’s advantage. Peake, Ev. 7, 64r-66.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 F. Cas. 478, 1 Cranch 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-carolin-circtddc-1802.