Smith v. Carl Woodard, Inc.
This text of 568 So. 2d 1360 (Smith v. Carl Woodard, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ray S. SMITH, Anthony Papania and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
v.
CARL WOODARD, INC., et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
PER CURIAM.
Granted. There are issues of material fact in conflict, such as the use and availability of drawings and the authorization for placement of the poles. Furthermore, it is questionable whether movers are entitled to judgment as a matter of law by application of La.Rev.Stat. 9:2771 to the circumstances of this case. A trial on the merits is therefore warranted.
Accordingly, the summary judgment is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the district court for trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
568 So. 2d 1360, 1990 WL 177639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-carl-woodard-inc-la-1990.