Smith v. Carl Woodard, Inc.
568 So. 2d 1360, 1990 WL 177639
Opinion
Ray S. SMITH, Anthony Papania and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
v.
CARL WOODARD, INC., et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
PER CURIAM.
Granted. There are issues of material fact in conflict, such as the use and availability of drawings and the authorization for placement of the poles. Furthermore, it is questionable whether movers are entitled to judgment as a matter of law by application of La.Rev.Stat. 9:2771 to the circumstances of this case. A trial on the merits is therefore warranted.
Accordingly, the summary judgment is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the district court for trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Carl Woodard, Inc., 568 So. 2d 1360, 1990 WL 177639 (La. 1990).
568 So. 2d 1360 (Smith v. Carl Woodard, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richard v. State Through DOTD
610 So. 2d 839 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1992)
Cazenave v. Pierce
568 So. 2d 1360 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1990)