Smith v. Canfield
1 Root 372
This text of 1 Root 372 (Smith v. Canfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Canfield, 1 Root 372 (Colo. 1792).
Opinion
Judgment — -That tlie plaintiff’s reply is insufficient; upon tbe principle tbat a bond upon a writ of error and on an audita querela, does not extend to tbe interest on tbe debt, for tbe time payment is delayed thereby. See Lane v. Breed, New London September 1790.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-canfield-conn-1792.