Smith v. Cahill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Smith v. Cahill

182 So. 3d 567, 2015 WL 1779826

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 17, 2015

Docket1140305

StatusPublished

This text of 182 So. 3d 567 (Smith v. Cahill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Cahill, 182 So. 3d 567, 2015 WL 1779826 (Ala. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals? opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED. '

STUART, BOLIN, MURDOCK, SHAW, MAIN, WISE, and BRYAN, JJ., concur. MOORE, C.J., and PARKER, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals? opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED. '

STUART, BOLIN, MURDOCK, SHAW, MAIN, WISE, and BRYAN, JJ., concur. MOORE, C.J., and PARKER, J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 So. 3d 567, 2015 WL 1779826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-cahill-ala-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack