Smith v. Burtis
1 Ant. N.P. Cas. 152
Opinion
The improvements, made by the ancestor, are sufficient to evince a claim of title, and constitute his entry a disseisin. The descent, subsequently cast, places this cause exactly in the same situation as it would have been, had the lessors oí the plaintiff been in quiet possession for twenty years. The defendants must be considered as holding tortiously; the right of possession is in the lessors of the plaintiff. The defendants must resort to a r [154] action, if they have title. It cannot be set up in this. suit.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Burtis, 1 Ant. N.P. Cas. 152 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).
1 Ant. N.P. Cas. 152 (Smith v. Burtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jackson ex dem. Decker v. Merrill
6 Johns. 185 (New York Supreme Court, 1810)