Smith v. Bunch

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Bunch

671 F. App'x 877

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2016·No. No. 16-7124·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elbert Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, as amended, after conducting review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, wé affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Bunch, No. 7:15-cv-00491-JPJ-RSB, 2016 WL 3963240 (W.D. Va. July 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elbert Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, as amended, after conducting review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, wé affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Bunch, No. 7:15-cv-00491-JPJ-RSB, 2016 WL 3963240 (W.D. Va. July 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Smith v. Bunch, 671 F. App'x 877 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 877 (Smith v. Bunch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related