Smith v. BRP Development Corporation

S.D. New York

Smith v. BRP Development Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 19, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-11794·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCU SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED RASHIEM SMITH, DOC #:__ DATE FILED: _ 10/19/2020 Plaintiff, -against- 19-cv-11794 (MKV) BRP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNITED DBT SECURITY CORP, and DARRUL BROWN, Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a report from the mediator informing the Court that the parties have reached agreement on all issues [ECF #24]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by November 18, 2020. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

Date: October 19, 2020 MARY {SAY V OC New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCU SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED RASHIEM SMITH, DOC #:__ DATE FILED: _ 10/19/2020 Plaintiff, -against- 19-cv-11794 (MKV) BRP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNITED DBT SECURITY CORP, and DARRUL BROWN, Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a report from the mediator informing the Court that the parties have reached agreement on all issues [ECF #24]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by November 18, 2020. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

Date: October 19, 2020 MARY {SAY V OC New York, NY United States District Judge

Smith v. BRP Development Corporation, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Smith v. BRP Development Corporation (Smith v. BRP Development Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related