Smith v. Brown
3 Binn. 201, 1810 Pa. LEXIS 74
Opinion
The rule of this court has been, since the case of Millar v. Hall, to discharge on common bail, unless the state,-under which the discharge was given, refuses to extend the same courtesy to the citizens of this state. But I think it fair to presume, unless some reason is shewn to the contrary, that such courtesy is extended; and such has been the course hitherto pursued by the court, where discharges have been pleaded under the laws of our sister states.
Rule absolute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Brown, 3 Binn. 201, 1810 Pa. LEXIS 74 (Pa. 1810).
3 Binn. 201 (Smith v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fisher v. Stayton
3 Del. 271 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1840)
Andrews v. Herriot
4 Cow. 508 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
Hinkley v. Marean
12 F. Cas. 205 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1822)
Campbell v. Claudius
4 F. Cas. 1161 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania, 1817)
James v. Allen
1 U.S. 188 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1786)