Smith v. Brown

3 N.J.L. 1047
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 15, 1813·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

— If the damage, demanded, was for a tort, the objection would he well founded; but in this case, the damage demanded, was for not performing a contract; the whole is in contract.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Brown, 3 N.J.L. 1047 (N.J. 1813).

3 N.J.L. 1047 (Smith v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.