Smith v. Brisbane
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 587
This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 587 (Smith v. Brisbane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Brisbane, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 587 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1771).
Opinion
On Motion of Mr. Rutledge Solicitor for the Defendant Benjamin Smith It is Ordered that a Commission do issue for taking his Answer in this Cause directed to Colonel Benjamin Singleton Mr. John Wright and Mr. Samuel West.
Charles town September 16. 1771.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-brisbane-ctchansc-1771.