Smith v. Brinson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Smith v. Brinson

94 S.E. 59, 21 Ga. App. 169, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 501

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 1, 1917

Docket8689

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 94 S.E. 59 (Smith v. Brinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Brinson, 94 S.E. 59, 21 Ga. App. 169, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 501 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Where the relation of landlord and cropper exists, and before the landlord has received his part of the crops so raised and is fully paid for all advances made to the cropper in aid of making the crops, possessory warrant will lie, under the Civil Code (1910), § 3706, for the recovery of such crops as it is shown the cropper seeks to exclude from the possession of the landlord. '

2. Upon the petition and the answer it was not error for the.court to overrule the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Certiorari; from Grady superior court — Judge Harrell. March 14, 1917.

L. W. Rigsby, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Ledford, Claude Christopher, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI