Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire Operations LLC

420 F. App'x 300
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 4, 2011·No. No. 10-2208·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adrian Marion Smith appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice and for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire Operations, LLC, No. 1:10-cv-01757-MBS, 2010 WL 4027972 (D.S.C. Oct. 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire Operations LLC, 420 F. App'x 300 (4th Cir. 2011).

420 F. App'x 300 (Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire Operations LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire Operations LLC
181 L. Ed. 2d 6 (Supreme Court, 2011)