Smith v. Bradley

1 Root 150
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided January 15, 1790·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

It is no cause of arrest that the jury have found their verdict upon insufficient evidence, for they are judges of the weight of evidence. Woodruff v. Whittlesey, Kirby, 61. The consideration of the promise is laid to have been in April A. D. 1781, but the promise did not arise until the plaintiff was compelled to pay Ool. Champion said order; and it was a promise or obligation which the law raised from the natural equity of the transaction, and not within said statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Bradley, 1 Root 150 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

1 Root 150 (Smith v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thouvenin v. Lea
26 Tex. 612 (Texas Supreme Court, 1863)