Smith v. Bowery Savings Bank
269 A.D. 1013, 59 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5050
Opinion
Judgment and decree unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents Alice S. Petluck and Samuel Cohen, as executors, etc. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Wasservogel, JJ. [183 Misc. 671.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Bowery Savings Bank, 269 A.D. 1013, 59 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5050 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
269 A.D. 1013 (Smith v. Bowery Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Pollak
183 Misc. 671 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1944)