Smith v. Borough of Barnegat Light

529 A.2d 1000, 219 N.J. Super. 11, 1987 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1243
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJune 10, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 529 A.2d 1000 (Smith v. Borough of Barnegat Light) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Borough of Barnegat Light, 529 A.2d 1000, 219 N.J. Super. 11, 1987 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1243 (N.J. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter comes before us by way of appellants’ motion for a stay pending appeal. By separate order we have denied that motion. .We have accelerated the appeal for purposes of argument and disposition because it involves an election matter. See R. 1:2—5(1).

On our own motion we summarily affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Serpentelli in [12]*12his written opinion of June 4, 1987, reported at 219 N.J.Super. 231 (Law Div.1987). See R. 2:8-3(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Booker v. Rice
71 A.3d 206 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2013)
Patterson v. Cooper
682 A.2d 266 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
Shalita v. Township of Washington
636 A.2d 568 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
Brubaker v. Ship Bottom Bor.
586 A.2d 867 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
State v. Hurtado
529 A.2d 1000 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 A.2d 1000, 219 N.J. Super. 11, 1987 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-borough-of-barnegat-light-njsuperctappdiv-1987.