Smith v. Bond

Supreme Court of Iowa

Smith v. Bond

48 Iowa 608

DecidedJune 10, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 48 Iowa 608 (Smith v. Bond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Bond, 48 Iowa 608 (iowa 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Day, J.

None of tile evidence respecting the conveyance from Epley to Smith is contained in the record. The cases are submitted solely upon the questions presented as to the validity of the principal judgment recovered in the main case of Bond v. Epley. The holding in that case that the judgment was rendered upon sufficient notice, and appearance by attorney, disposes of all the questions involved in these cases. The judgment in that case was corrected as to the illegal interest, and hence there is no ground for the continuance of the injunction in Smith v. Bond et al.

The judgment in each case is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Day, J.

None of tile evidence respecting the conveyance from Epley to Smith is contained in the record. The cases are submitted solely upon the questions presented as to the validity of the principal judgment recovered in the main case of Bond v. Epley. The holding in that case that the judgment was rendered upon sufficient notice, and appearance by attorney, disposes of all the questions involved in these cases. The judgment in that case was corrected as to the illegal interest, and hence there is no ground for the continuance of the injunction in Smith v. Bond et al.

The judgment in each case is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 Iowa 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-bond-iowa-1878.