Smith v. Boatrite

Supreme Court of Georgia

Smith v. Boatrite

41 Ga. 413

DecidedJune 15, 1870

StatusPublished

This text of 41 Ga. 413 (Smith v. Boatrite) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Boatrite, 41 Ga. 413 (Ga. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

(Atlanta,

BILL OF EXCEPTIONS—DECISION AND ERRORS MUST BE PLAINLY STATED.*—A bill of exceptions must specify plainly the decision complained of and the error alleged, and if it do not it will be dismissed. (R.)

Bill of Exceptions. From Marion county. March Term, 1870.

Upon motion of defendant’s counsel, the bill of exceptions was dismissed because it did not specify plainly the decision complained of and the errors alleged.

BILL OF EXCEPTIONS—ERRORS MUST BE PLAINLY STATED.'—See foot-note to Taylor v. Flint, 35 Ga. 124.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(Atlanta,

BILL OF EXCEPTIONS—DECISION AND ERRORS MUST BE PLAINLY STATED.*—A bill of exceptions must specify plainly the decision complained of and the error alleged, and if it do not it will be dismissed. (R.)

Bill of Exceptions. From Marion county. March Term, 1870.

Upon motion of defendant’s counsel, the bill of exceptions was dismissed because it did not specify plainly the decision complained of and the errors alleged.

BILL OF EXCEPTIONS—ERRORS MUST BE PLAINLY STATED.'—See foot-note to Taylor v. Flint, 35 Ga. 124.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Ga. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-boatrite-ga-1870.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack