Smith v. Boatrite

Supreme Court of Georgia

Smith v. Boatrite

41 Ga. 413

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1870·Published

Opinion

(Atlanta,

BILL OF EXCEPTIONS—DECISION AND ERRORS MUST BE PLAINLY STATED.*—A bill of exceptions must specify plainly the decision complained of and the error alleged, and if it do not it will be dismissed. (R.)

Bill of Exceptions. From Marion county. March Term, 1870.

Upon motion of defendant’s counsel, the bill of exceptions was dismissed because it did not specify plainly the decision complained of and the errors alleged.

BILL OF EXCEPTIONS—ERRORS MUST BE PLAINLY STATED.'—See foot-note to Taylor v. Flint, 35 Ga. 124.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(Atlanta,

BILL OF EXCEPTIONS—DECISION AND ERRORS MUST BE PLAINLY STATED.*—A bill of exceptions must specify plainly the decision complained of and the error alleged, and if it do not it will be dismissed. (R.)

Bill of Exceptions. From Marion county. March Term, 1870.

Upon motion of defendant’s counsel, the bill of exceptions was dismissed because it did not specify plainly the decision complained of and the errors alleged.

BILL OF EXCEPTIONS—ERRORS MUST BE PLAINLY STATED.'—See foot-note to Taylor v. Flint, 35 Ga. 124.

Smith v. Boatrite, 41 Ga. 413 (Ga. 1870).

Pincite

41 Ga. 413 (Smith v. Boatrite) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related