Smith v. Board of Fire Commissioners
103 A. 1054, 90 N.J.L. 719, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 422
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court, eo nomine Durkin v. Fire Commissioners of Newark, 89 N. J. L. 468.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Teenciiard, Parker, Bergen, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Board of Fire Commissioners, 103 A. 1054, 90 N.J.L. 719, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 422 (N.J. 1917).
103 A. 1054 (Smith v. Board of Fire Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.