Smith v. Blanchard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Smith v. Blanchard

116 A. 667, 273 Pa. 158, 1922 Pa. LEXIS 538

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 20, 1922

DocketAppeal, No. 34

StatusPublished

This text of 116 A. 667 (Smith v. Blanchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Blanchard, 116 A. 667, 273 Pa. 158, 1922 Pa. LEXIS 538 (Pa. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an equity proceeding wherein a preliminary injunction was granted, which was subsequently dissolved on condition that defendants pay into court an amount the chancellor deemed sufficient to indemnify plaintiffs in event of the final decree being in their favor; plaintiffs have appealed from this decree.

It is sufficient for present purposes to say, without deciding whether or not the ruling complained of is an appealable order, we are not convinced of an abuse of discretion.

Appeal dismissed at cost of appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This is an equity proceeding wherein a preliminary injunction was granted, which was subsequently dissolved on condition that defendants pay into court an amount the chancellor deemed sufficient to indemnify plaintiffs in event of the final decree being in their favor; plaintiffs have appealed from this decree.

It is sufficient for present purposes to say, without deciding whether or not the ruling complained of is an appealable order, we are not convinced of an abuse of discretion.

Appeal dismissed at cost of appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 A. 667, 273 Pa. 158, 1922 Pa. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-blanchard-pa-1922.