Smith v. Bird

26 S.E.2d 181, 196 Ga. 191, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 312
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 11, 1943
Docket14545.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 S.E.2d 181 (Smith v. Bird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Bird, 26 S.E.2d 181, 196 Ga. 191, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 312 (Ga. 1943).

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

The instant ease originated in a court of ordinary, and went by appeal to a superior court. The bill of exceptions recites that the case was “a caveat to the final return and dismission of the administrators on the estate of,” etc. The record contains the caveat, but not the proceeding to which the caveat was directed. A caveat to the final return of the administrators, as filed in the court of ordinary, alleged that it should not be sanctioned, because of acts of waste and mismanagement of assets, and that the estate had not been fully ad *192 ministered. The answer of the administrators contained a prayer that the caveat be denied, and that letters of dismission issue to them. The ordinary rendered a judgment against the caveat. The superior court on appeal appointed an auditor to pass upon all questions of law and fact. After hearing evidence the auditor filed his report, making certain findings in favor of the caveatrix, but finding generally in favor of the administrators The caveatrix “excepted, as a matter of law, to the report of the auditor.” Subsequently the court entered a final decree overruling such exceptions and sustaining the report of the auditor. The caveatrix excepted, and assigned error on the rulings and on the decree. Seld, that the case is neither an equity case nor one involving construction of a will, within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Nor is there other basis for jurisdiction in this court. Therefore the case is transferred to the Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction. McDowell v. McDowell, 194 Ga. 88 (20 S. E. 2d, 602), and cit.

No. 14545. June 11, 1943. Gohen Anderson, Julian Groover, and W. G. Neville, for plaintiffs in error. Fred, T. Lanier, contra.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Miller
121 S.E.2d 340 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 S.E.2d 181, 196 Ga. 191, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-bird-ga-1943.