Smith v. Bertini

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Bertini

669 F. App'x 631

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 17, 2016·No. No. 16-1774·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Arthur Smith appeals the district court’s order granting Lisa Ann Bertini’s motion to dismiss Smith’s civil complaint [632] against Bertini. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Smith v. Bertini, No. 2:15-cv-00509-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Arthur Smith appeals the district court’s order granting Lisa Ann Bertini’s motion to dismiss Smith’s civil complaint [632] against Bertini. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Smith v. Bertini, No. 2:15-cv-00509-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Smith v. Bertini, 669 F. App'x 631 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

669 F. App'x 631 (Smith v. Bertini) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.