Home/Court of Chancery of South Carolina/Smith v. Beresford

Smith v. Beresford

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 277
CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 4, 1722
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 277 (Smith v. Beresford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Beresford, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 277 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1722).

Opinion

Upon Motion this day, made unto this Court, by Mr. Hume of Counsel for the Defendants (Mr. Whitaker, the Complainants Counsel being present) the Order of this Court of the 15th December last past, for dissolving the Injunction obtained by the Complainant for stay of the Defendants proceedings at Law, being read, was approved of arid confirmed.

Intr.

Thos Lamboll Deputy Register

Present, His Excellency The Governour, The Honourable Arthur Middleton,8 William Bull, Charles Hart, William Gibbon, Benjamin De La Con-seillere, Esquires of His Majesty’s honourable Council Chancellour; Mr. William Tunley Master in Chancery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-beresford-ctchansc-1722.