Smith v. Bennett

159 S.E. 853, 173 Ga. 159, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 285
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 25, 1931
DocketNo. 7943
StatusPublished

This text of 159 S.E. 853 (Smith v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Bennett, 159 S.E. 853, 173 Ga. 159, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 285 (Ga. 1931).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Under the pleadings and the evidence, the judge, to whom the ease was submitted for decision without the intervention of a jury, did not err in finding for the plaintiff and rendering the judgment to which exception is taken.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Eines, J., who dissents, and Gilbert, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wagner v. Robinson
56 Ga. 47 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1876)
Mickleberry v. O'Neal
25 S.E. 933 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)
Jones v. Harrell
35 S.E. 690 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Blount & Morel v. Dugger
41 S.E. 270 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Mays v. Shields
45 S.E. 68 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Cornelia Planing Mill Co. v. Wilcox
59 S.E. 223 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Napier v. Strong
91 S.E. 579 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 S.E. 853, 173 Ga. 159, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-bennett-ga-1931.