Smith v. Bennett

159 S.E. 853, 173 Ga. 159, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 285
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 25, 1931·No. No. 7943·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Under the pleadings and the evidence, the judge, to whom the ease was submitted for decision without the intervention of a jury, did not err in finding for the plaintiff and rendering the judgment to which exception is taken.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Eines, J., who dissents, and Gilbert, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Bennett, 159 S.E. 853, 173 Ga. 159, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 285 (Ga. 1931).

159 S.E. 853 (Smith v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wagner v. Robinson
56 Ga. 47 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1876)
Mickleberry v. O'Neal
25 S.E. 933 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)
Jones v. Harrell
35 S.E. 690 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Blount & Morel v. Dugger
41 S.E. 270 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Mays v. Shields
45 S.E. 68 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Cornelia Planing Mill Co. v. Wilcox
59 S.E. 223 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Napier v. Strong
91 S.E. 579 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)