Smith v. Beach

3 Day 268
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
DecidedJune 15, 1808
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 Day 268 (Smith v. Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Beach, 3 Day 268 (circtdct 1808).

Opinion

Bv the Court,

unanimously. A corrupt agreement is essential to constitute usury; and to form a corrupt agreement, as in all other contracts, the ittinds of the parties must meet. The assent of Beach was, therefore, as essential to the existence of, a usurious agreement as that of Bird.

From these premises it follows, as an undeniable consequence, that there could be no corrupt agreement while either of the parties remained ignorant of the excessive reservation; and the jury ought to have been so instructed.

NevV trial to be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garvin v. Linton
35 S.W. 430 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1896)
Calley v. Erb
9 Del. 315 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Day 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-beach-circtdct-1808.