Smith v. Batesville Security Bank
75 So. 2d 77, 222 Miss. 38, 1954 Miss. LEXIS 615
Opinion
This case presents a disputed question of fact which was resolved by the chancellor in favor of appellee. There was evidence sufficient to support a decree for either party. We have carefully considered the whole record and we are unable to say that the decision of the lower court was manifestly wrong or against the [42] great weight of the evidence. Therefore, under our decisions, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Batesville Security Bank, 75 So. 2d 77, 222 Miss. 38, 1954 Miss. LEXIS 615 (Mich. 1954).
75 So. 2d 77 (Smith v. Batesville Security Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCaffrey v. Mills
167 So. 2d 816 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1964)
Campbell v. Campbell
163 So. 2d 649 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1964)