Smith v. Barlow

67 Ill. 519
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 67 Ill. 519 (Smith v. Barlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Barlow, 67 Ill. 519 (Ill. 1873).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The only ground upon which a reversal is asked in this case is, that it stood as number 99 on the docket in the circuit court, and was tried, in the absence of defendant’s o counsel, before cases numbered 75 and 81, which counsel had been informed would be tried by a jury. It is true, the statute requires cases to be tried or otherwise disposed of in the order in which they are placed on the docket, unless the court, for good and sufficient cause, shall otherwise direct. This record does not show what disposition was made of cases 75 and 81, but if they were passed without being finally disposed of for the term, we must presume, in the absence of any statement of the cause in this record, that the court had good and sufficient cause for what was done. We may further remark that the suit is upon a promissory note, and, on the motion 'to set aside the verdict, there was filed no affidavit of merits entitled to consideration.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Staunton Coal Co. v. Menk
64 N.E. 278 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1902)
Staunton Coal Co. v. Menk
99 Ill. App. 254 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)
Ettinghausen v. Marx
86 Ill. 475 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Ill. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-barlow-ill-1873.