Smith v. Barksdale
This text of 34 S.E. 582 (Smith v. Barksdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A deed founded partly on love and affection, and partly upon a binding promise by the grantees to pay off all the existing indebtedness of the grantor, is not one based on a purely voluntary consideration, and when by mistake the description of the premises intended to be conveyed is erroneously set forth in such deed, the same may be reformed.
2. There was “ no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced, with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom,” demahded the verdict of which complaint is made; and consequently there was no error in directing the jury to find for the plaintiffs. Civil Code, § 5331.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 S.E. 582, 110 Ga. 278, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-barksdale-ga-1899.