Smith v. Barbour
678 S.E.2d 670, 363 N.C. 375
Opinion
Tony Ray SMITH, Plaintiff
v.
Staci Day BARBOUR and Bilal Kanawati
v.
Collene Barbour and Stacy Barbour.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Marc Sokol, Raleigh, for Bilal Kanawati.
Deborah Sandlin, Raleigh, for Collene & Staci Barbour.
Julianne B. Rothert, Raleigh, for Smith.
Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 671 S.E.2d 578.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of March 2009 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of June 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Barbour, 678 S.E.2d 670, 363 N.C. 375 (N.C. 2009).
678 S.E.2d 670 (Smith v. Barbour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marsh v. Marsh
816 S.E.2d 529 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)
Summerville v. Summerville
814 S.E.2d 887 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)
Moore v. Moore
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
Woodring v. Woodring
745 S.E.2d 13 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)