Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Smith v. Bales

Smith v. Bales

66 S.E. 627, 7 Ga. App. 225, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 603
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 24, 1909·No. 1910·Published

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. Hie excerpts from the charge assigned as error are not materially erroneous, when considered in connection with the entire charge, which clearly, fairly, and correctly presented to the jury the law applicable to the issues.

2. The evidence in behalf of the plaintiff fully supports the verdict in liis favor. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Bales, 66 S.E. 627, 7 Ga. App. 225, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 603 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

66 S.E. 627 (Smith v. Bales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.