Smith v. Aultman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Smith v. Aultman

127 S.E. 774, 160 Ga. 364, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 158

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 20, 1925·No. No. 4612·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the amendment offered by the plaintiff to the petition.

2. “An error in a decree or judgment can not be made a ground of exception to the overruling of a motion for new trial.” Sweetman v. Owens, 147 Ga. 436 (2) (94 S. E. 542), and authorities cited; Fowler v. Johnson, 151 Ga. 122 (106 S. E. 90).

3. No error is shown; the verdict is supported by evidence; the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the amendment offered by the plaintiff to the petition.

2. “An error in a decree or judgment can not be made a ground of exception to the overruling of a motion for new trial.” Sweetman v. Owens, 147 Ga. 436 (2) (94 S. E. 542), and authorities cited; Fowler v. Johnson, 151 Ga. 122 (106 S. E. 90).

3. No error is shown; the verdict is supported by evidence; the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Smith v. Aultman, 127 S.E. 774, 160 Ga. 364, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 158 (Ga. 1925).

Pincite

127 S.E. 774 (Smith v. Aultman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related