Smith v. Aultman

127 S.E. 774, 160 Ga. 364, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 158
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 20, 1925
DocketNo. 4612
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 S.E. 774 (Smith v. Aultman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Aultman, 127 S.E. 774, 160 Ga. 364, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 158 (Ga. 1925).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the amendment offered by the plaintiff to the petition.

2. “An error in a decree or judgment can not be made a ground of exception to the overruling of a motion for new trial.” Sweetman v. Owens, 147 Ga. 436 (2) (94 S. E. 542), and authorities cited; Fowler v. Johnson, 151 Ga. 122 (106 S. E. 90).

3. No error is shown; the verdict is supported by evidence; the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. Perry
9 S.E.2d 160 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 S.E. 774, 160 Ga. 364, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-aultman-ga-1925.